bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DX58SO
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100414
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 30 '19 at 07:28
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3565
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 167
70% 115 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 419
47% 367 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Zotac(19DA 1160) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.87
1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 74 88 72 75 74 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.7% Poor
Read 180
Write 155
Mixed 144
SusWrite 76.9
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 10.5
50% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 17.2
DQ Write 26.7
DQ Mixed 14.4
13% 19.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 71%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130
6TB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 167 171 168 175 173 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 33
Write 27.7
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 15.5
19% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 103%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
520GB free
Firmware: 0740
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 15 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 27.5
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 15.5
18% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
162% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.6% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.4
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback