Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180820
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 29 '19 at 19:32
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 30.1
2-Core 65.6
21% 47.8 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 142
22% 158 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 25% Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1827 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.72
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 25.2
34% 32.8 fps
MRender 31.6
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 25.1
25% 31.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 79 90 84 92 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 37.9
Write 41.3
Mixed 21
SusWrite 91.5
35% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
43% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
420GB free
Firmware: GG2OAC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 45 48 46 44 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 33.3
Write 58.1
Mixed 30
SusWrite 48.1
31% 42.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 58%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB
217GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 35 39 37 37 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 25.7
Write 30
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 38.9
21% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 32%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 2.7 3.2 2.8 2.8 3.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Read 10
Write 6.3
Mixed 7
SusWrite 3.2
8% 6.62 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 13%
USB Flash Disk 8GB
6GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 7.9 9.5 9.1 9 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 4
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 9.1
11% 9.38 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - RAM benchmark error
Poor: 65% Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback