Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core m3-7Y30 4,585 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 56.3 2-Core 69.9 44% 65.7 Pts	4-Core 84 8-Core 87.4 11% 85.7 Pts	64-Core 58.3 4% 58.3 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 11,115 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6709 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.49% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.96 Parallax 1.59 1% 1.62 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 4.78 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.49% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NT-512 512GB 740 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: T180731 SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 328 227 113 82 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 386 Write 361 Mixed 349 SusWrite 191 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 30.8 105% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 163 128% 178 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GB 211 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 7.3 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7.3 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 99.5 40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	486x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	458x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,365x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	488x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16