Asus Rampage Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Rampage Extreme  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090727
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 29 '19 at 05:11
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 40.2
2-Core 80
42% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 155
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 338 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.37% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 3.28
2% 3.33 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.19 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.37%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP112PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 89 85 60 63 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.2% Below average
Read 176
Write 112
Mixed 127
SusWrite 88.1
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 16.8
71% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 39.9
DQ Mixed 24.7
21% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
854GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 119 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 117
Write 109
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 119
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 68%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
4GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 8 11 8.1 11 9.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
6.66% Terrible
Read 23.4
Write 7
Mixed 9.9
SusWrite 8.6
14% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.66%
Great: 9%
General UDisk 2GB
2GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 7.7 7.8 7.7 7.5 7.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Read 15.9
Write 5.2
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 7.5
10% 8.22 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 7%
SMI USB DISK 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.5 3.1 2.8 2.9 3.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 16.6
Write 1.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.1
6% 6.33 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 5.4
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage Extreme Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $170
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback