Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 60% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170723
Uptime	9.8 Days
Run Date	May 28 '19 at 15:45
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Memory 88.4 1-Core 137 2-Core 252 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 657 71% 562 Pts	64-Core 670 42% 670 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 116 Parallax 97.2 89% 108 fps	MRender 98.5 Gravity 100 Splatting 102 82% 100 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 11 17 21 15 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 908GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 112 116 113 118 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 183 Write 166 Mixed 39 SusWrite 115 91% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 138% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 107%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 13,353 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 772GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 121 118 122 119 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 114 Write 17.5 Mixed 80 SusWrite 119 62% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.7 257% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 65%
Seagate BUP BL 4TB 4,922 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 107 105 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 89.2 Write 89.8 Mixed 98.3 SusWrite 103 71% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.9 248% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion+ 1TB 4,125 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 225GB free Firmware: 0502 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 40 40 38 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 30.5 Write 27 Mixed 11.3 SusWrite 39.3 20% 27 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 71%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB 7,384 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3.5TB free, PID 25fa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 20 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 34.7 Write 36.5 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 20.7 40% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 63%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB 7,384 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1TB free, PID 25fa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 20 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	Read 30.8 Write 34.2 Mixed 26 SusWrite 20.6 38% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.7 193% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 2x16GB 285 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.3% Average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 11.9 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 13.5 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	997x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	94x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	252x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	41x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,133

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16