Fujitsu CELSIUS R940

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R940  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3358-A2
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 28 '19 at 08:11
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 88
2-Core 150
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 616
53% 454 Pts
64-Core 2,037
126% 2,037 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
PNY(196E 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.3% Very good
Lighting 96.8
Reflection 110
Parallax 102
79% 103 fps
MRender 97.6
Gravity 94.9
Splatting 99.7
80% 97.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN1T0HMJP-00000 1TB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 105 110 111 111 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 434
Write 367
Mixed 377
SusWrite 134
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 42.8
132% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 72.5
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 132
121% 177 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 125%
Samsung MZ7LN1T0HMJP-00000 1TB
126GB free
Firmware: 100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 425 430 430 428 429 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 424
Mixed 381
SusWrite 428
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 42.5
140% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 184
176% 277 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 117 116 119 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 82.7
Write 99.8
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 115
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
171% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC 2x31.5GB
2 of 16 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R940 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R940

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $238
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback