| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M4N68T-M-V2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110126 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 27 '19 at 19:19 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 34% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
49.8%
Average
|
46% 70.2 Pts
|
17% 127 Pts
|
8% 126 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon R5 200
XFX(1682 5230) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1007
|
1.54%
Terrible
|
2% 2.02 fps
|
1% 1.62 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDS721010CLA 1TB-$54
780GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 52 61 69 71 75 MB/s
|
38.8%
Below average
|
47% 64 MB/s
|
88% 0.67 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
10GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 12 MB/s
|
11.6%
Very poor
|
19% 14.4 MB/s
|
115% 2.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.3%
Below average
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
21% 7.47 GB/s
|
48% 84.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4N68T-M-V2 Builds (Compare 99 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M-V2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples | 12x |
| Athlon II X2 255AMDBench 42%, 3,508 samples | 8x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 7x |
| GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples | 7x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |