| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970A-G/3.1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160112 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 27 '19 at 17:04 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.4%
Very good
|
69% 115 Pts
|
48% 397 Pts
|
32% 508 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.8%
Average
|
42% 65.9 fps
|
49% 61 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 78 64 62 23 MB/s
|
30.4%
Below average
|
36% 161 MB/s
|
41% 14.4 MB/s
|
29% 42.6 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 171 172 174 172 MB/s
|
97%
Outstanding
|
88% 122 MB/s
|
80% 0.53 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
233GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 106 106 105 105 MB/s
|
70.7%
Very good
|
82% 111 MB/s
|
136% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5584-007.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (82nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.4%
Above average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
66% 60.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 350 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 112x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 112x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 80x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $269 |