Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 76 1-Core 106 2-Core 214 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 421 58% 432 Pts	64-Core 439 27% 439 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU) 85,536 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Lighting 14.6 Reflection 13.7 Parallax 18.3 12% 15.5 fps	MRender 6.86 Gravity 13.9 Splatting 18.6 11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 203 201 206 264 214 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 319 Write 151 Mixed 166 SusWrite 224 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 20.6 84% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 36.4 DQ Write 39.5 DQ Mixed 36 28% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 100%
Kingston DT 101 II 4GB 873 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1625 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.1 3.5 3.5 3.2 3.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	2.29% Terrible	Read 4 Write 2.5 Mixed 2 SusWrite 3.3 4% 2.95 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.29% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SP008GBLFU240B02 1x8GB 1,134 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	46.7% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 88.4 45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	60x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16