| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7B79 |
| Motherboard | MSI X470 GAMING PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190123 |
| Uptime | 2 Days |
| Run Date | May 27 '19 at 14:51 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 66% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.4%
Good
|
54% 90.6 Pts
|
43% 341 Pts
|
27% 429 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
PNY(196E 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.3%
Average
|
50% 60.1 fps
|
42% 52.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
19% 80.7 MB/s
|
80% 27.5 MB/s
|
88% 205 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50
931GB free
Firmware: CV26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 192 207 213 212 213 MB/s
|
115%
Outstanding
|
124% 169 MB/s
|
176% 1.33 MB/s
| |
|
ASMT 2105 1TB
135GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 50 55 54 55 49 MB/s
|
27.1%
Poor
|
78% 58.3 MB/s
|
97% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
64.4%
Good
|
66% 23.2 GB/s
|
55% 19.1 GB/s
|
41% 97.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,478 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 1,174x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 747x |
| Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 642x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 323x |
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 282x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 225x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $702 |