Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705GM
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180921
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 26 '19 at 23:05
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	66% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 69 2-Core 138 58% 96 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 444 44% 359 Pts	64-Core 575 36% 575 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1B4E) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9924 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	14.8% Very poor	Lighting 10 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 30.2 8% 17.3 fps	MRender 8.81 Gravity 35.7 Splatting 48.8 28% 31.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 382GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1600 977 795 798 793 788 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	193% Outstanding	Read 1,455 Write 1,764 Mixed 1202 SusWrite 958 303% 1,345 MB/s	4K Read 45.5 4K Write 73 4K Mixed 52.2 174% 56.9 MB/s	DQ Read 530 DQ Write 462 DQ Mixed 494 371% 496 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 355%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 708GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 103 123 123 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 144 Write 136 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 119 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.6 227% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB 44,819 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	45.8% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 13.2 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 15.9 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	577x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	46x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	324x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	299x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	186x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	110x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	53x

RAM
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	141x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	119x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16