PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z (all builds) |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150323 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | May 26 '19 at 22:24 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 65% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
|
63.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.3
|
54.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 278 240 228 228 223 MB/s
|
89.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 108 107 110 107 MB/s
|
52%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
286GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 73 72 73 73 MB/s
|
41.3%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
379GB free
Firmware: SM30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 76 77 78 78 MB/s
|
46.3%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
431GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 100 101 102 101 MB/s
|
57.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 441x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 215x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 67x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 58x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 48x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 45x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $630 |