| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Csl-computer A0000001 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK H110M-PLUS |
| Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170316 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 26 '19 at 19:13 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.7%
Very good
|
74% 132 Pts
|
49% 359 Pts
|
24% 393 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2254 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
16.8%
Very poor
|
0% 21.2 fps
|
49% 57.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 52 57 56 54 42 MB/s
|
66.1%
Good
|
61% 276 MB/s
|
121% 41 MB/s
|
93% 132 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
758GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 144 166 167 162 129 MB/s
|
85.4%
Excellent
|
96% 131 MB/s
|
130% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
60.1%
Good
|
61% 21.5 GB/s
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
50% 79.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,720 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Csl-computer A0000001
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 237x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 159x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 153x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 373x |
| RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 96x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 76x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 104% - Outstanding | Total price: $648 |