| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock N68-VS3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121031 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 26 '19 at 19:11 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 91% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
35.7%
Below average
|
32% 44.7 Pts
|
8% 62.2 Pts
|
5% 87.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Sapphire(174B E206) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
|
1.46%
Terrible
|
1% 1.8 fps
|
2% 1.79 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 41 56 71 74 83 MB/s
|
33.8%
Below average
|
42% 58 MB/s
|
87% 0.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5474-038.A00LF BKH400UD25608-1333 8GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
16%
Very poor
|
16% 5.57 GB/s
|
6% 2.1 GB/s
|
32% 124 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N68-VS3 FX Builds (Compare 131 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock N68-VS3 FX
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 18x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 15x |
| Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples | 12x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples | 16x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 8x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $138 |