Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 26 '19 at 18:56
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 72.6 1-Core 103 2-Core 208 71% 128 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 642 66% 530 Pts	64-Core 850 53% 850 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8572) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.78% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 4.38 Parallax 3.94 4% 4.24 fps	MRender 4.76 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.78% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.06A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 114 115 114 130 111 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Read 190 Write 145 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 113 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 1.6 300% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 9,009 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 161GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 79 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 88.3 Write 87.5 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 79.8 96% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 547GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 77 78 77 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 81.5 Write 81.5 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 77.4 90% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown V02D4LF8GB5285282400 1x8GB 158 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 14.1 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 16.3 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 95.4 42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	816x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	783x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	742x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	772x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	447x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	413x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	258x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	194x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	144x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $428

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16