Alienware Aurora

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Alienware Aurora (all builds)
Motherboard	Alienware 04VWF2
Memory	3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 26 '19 at 15:56
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 94.2 1-Core 67.6 2-Core 124 61% 95.4 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 314 32% 262 Pts	64-Core 312 19% 312 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Palit(1569 1381) 1GB CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1275 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Lighting 19.3 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 16.5 16% 17 fps	MRender 22.8 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 16.3 15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 150 59 58 57 58 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.1% Above average	Read 244 Write 227 Mixed 206 SusWrite 91.8 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 24.9 97% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 148 121% 171 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 85%
SMI USB DISK 16GB 4,287 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 9GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7.9 7.3 7.2 7.9 8.1 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	5.77% Terrible	Read 21.2 Write 6.2 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 7.5 12% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.77% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	49.5% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 18.8 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 12.7 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 59.4 67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aurora Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Alienware Aurora

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	218x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	87x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	51x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	34x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	32x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 3,736 samples	12x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	80x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	73x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	64x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $249

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16