Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Casper Excalibur G5K (all builds)
Motherboard	Casper Excalibur G5K
Memory	3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160707
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 25 '19 at 22:33
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 70.9 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 137 55% 92.7 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 381 38% 308 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M 73,363 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Clevo(1558 1501) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3064 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Lighting 21.6 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 18 18% 18.3 fps	MRender 17 Gravity 17.1 Splatting 9.35 11% 14.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 32 29 32 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 374 Write 50.5 Mixed 130 SusWrite 30.5 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 14 4K Mixed 15.5 50% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 13.9 DQ Mixed 33 38% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 59%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 732GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 59 60 60 60 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 77.7 Write 130 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 58.7 60% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.6 186% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GB 670 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.2% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 18.5 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 10.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 99.3 40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	67x

GPU
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	37x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	30x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	26x
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples	4x
S3 500G 500GBSandiskBench 92%, 12,292 samples	2x

RAM
CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 73%, 670 samples	35x
CT8G4SFS8213.C8FAD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 66%, 273 samples	17x
CT8G4SFS8213.M8FA 2x8GBCrucialBench 66%, 199 samples	11x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16