Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '19 at 22:33
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 158
2-Core 319
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,172
107% 900 Pts
64-Core 1,732
107% 1,732 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 107%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3603) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 171
Parallax 167
132% 166 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 172
Splatting 114
108% 134 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,513
Write 2,173
Mixed 1,680
472% 2,122 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 94.4
320% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,248
DQ Write 1,072
DQ Mixed 1,151
865% 1157 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung MZVLV128HCGR-00000 128GB
32GB free
Firmware: BXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 148 148 150 149 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 810
Write 154
Mixed 196
SusWrite 148
71% 327 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 33
179% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 558
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 228
202% 314 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
932GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 148 148 152 149 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 121
Write 113
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 148
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
196GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 104 104 96 100 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 141
Write 121
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 100
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 108%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 226 230 227 228 226 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 225
Mixed 106
SusWrite 228
140% 192 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.9
374% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 126%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 25
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 30.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 48.7
82% 48.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,035
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback