Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 25 '19 at 20:34
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Memory 88.5 1-Core 139 2-Core 277 92% 168 Pts	4-Core 556 8-Core 726 82% 641 Pts	64-Core 798 49% 798 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 117 Parallax 100 88% 109 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 100 Splatting 105 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 317 320 321 319 321 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 415 Write 319 Mixed 262 SusWrite 320 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 36.6 156% 60.3 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 236 203% 299 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 29GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 452 197 164 140 112 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 478 Mixed 393 SusWrite 255 89% 397 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 61.5 202% 73.9 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 354 266% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 134%
Intel SSDSC2BA100G3 100GB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 92GB free Firmware: 5DV10270 SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 202 204 203 203 204 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 360 Write 202 Mixed 237 SusWrite 202 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 94.2 4K Mixed 36.5 148% 54.8 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 233 177% 242 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.9% Good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 20.9 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 19.2 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	857x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	566x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	254x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,321

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16