Gigabyte GA-Z370M DS3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370M DS3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370M DS3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171218
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 25 '19 at 19:22
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	93%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 42.6 1-Core 39.9 2-Core 104 35% 62.3 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 290 39% 291 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85FD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	20.9% Poor	Lighting 21.1 Reflection 28.1 Parallax 34.1 17% 27.8 fps	MRender 35.6 Gravity 36.1 Splatting 32.3 28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 8.8 15 50 44 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 371 Write 269 Mixed 269 SusWrite 28.1 52% 235 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 29.6 4K Mixed 16.3 59% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 15.9 77% 173 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 108GB free Firmware: JPFOA39C SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 74 75 75 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 74.2 Write 75 Mixed 41 SusWrite 74.4 48% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown IM48GU88N24-FFFHMB 2x8GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 24.5 MC Mixed 21.8 65% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 6.3 23% 8.13 GB/s	Latency 191 21% 191 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M DS3H-CF

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	221x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	208x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	150x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	125x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	77x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	69x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	28x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	32x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	29x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $318

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16