Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
16 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '19 at 00:22
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-9920X-$615
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 81.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 268
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 1,096
98% 806 Pts
64-Core 2,180
146% 2,180 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$698
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 503
Reflection 436
Parallax 524
132% 488 fps
MRender 364
Gravity 452
Splatting 229
127% 348 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 127%
Great: 135%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 917 507 511 478 295 293 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 77% Great: 131%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 453 456 467 474 475 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 473
Mixed 454
SusWrite 463
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 60.3
208% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
862GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 453 456 467 474 475 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 476
Mixed 448
SusWrite 463
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 61.3
208% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK2T0TBN 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 405 417 300 278 281 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 61.2
Write 463
Mixed 374
SusWrite 348
72% 312 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 41.8
159% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 302
220% 281 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 99%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
273GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 146 147 147 145 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 138%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$138
517GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 130 129 130 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 121
Write 117
Mixed 104
SusWrite 128
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 85%
SABRENT 1TB
95GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,441
Write 2150
Mixed 1,605
1,301% 1,732 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 66.8
12,168% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,219
DQ Write 991
DQ Mixed 1,112
10,180% 1,108 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 18%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
111% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 58
MC Mixed 38.1
126% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 12.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 111%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 167%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $1,522
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $290Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback