Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	97% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180501
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '19 at 21:07
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 76.5 1-Core 113 2-Core 226 77% 138 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 909 80% 682 Pts	64-Core 1,246 77% 1,246 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% EVGA(3842 1071) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 114 Parallax 129 98% 121 fps	MRender 158 Gravity 114 Splatting 92.3 96% 121 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G5SA754D117-511 240GB 486 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: N0530A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 506 Write 371 Mixed 205 80% 361 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 78.8 4K Mixed 41.3 142% 50.4 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 132 147% 246 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 106%
Samsung MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GB 1,744 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 26GB free Firmware: DXM05H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 363 121 97 95 93 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Read 428 Write 191 Mixed 190 SusWrite 188 55% 249 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 90 4K Mixed 35.7 144% 53 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 116 117% 195 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 100%
Samsung MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GB 1,744 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 34GB free Firmware: DXM05H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 364 355 357 363 364 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 402 Write 163 Mixed 196 SusWrite 356 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 85.8 4K Mixed 36.3 143% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 107 109% 185 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 100%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,229 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 538GB free Firmware: JC4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 97 96 97 97 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 112 Write 99.5 Mixed 57 SusWrite 95.8 67% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 64%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 32GB-$5 2,386 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 7GB free, PID db8a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 36 Mixed 31.3 37% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.6 105% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 37%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 28GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 61 25 27 25 24 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 166 Write 60.5 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 38.1 94% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.7 157% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 39%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 30GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	9.83% Terrible	Read 20 Write 10.3 Mixed 8.3 SusWrite 3.8 12% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.2 146% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.83% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90 9,857 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	85.5% Excellent	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 28.2 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 32.3 SC Mixed 26.1 77% 26.8 GB/s	Latency 87.2 46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)