PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock X299 Taichi (all builds) |
Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170704 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 24 '19 at 09:51 |
Run Duration | 222 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
|
96.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 864 616 570 488 487 466 MB/s
|
226%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
90GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 487 485 484 475 475 MB/s
|
130%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
36GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 485 477 466 460 453 MB/s
|
117%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
196GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 93 95 93 90 MB/s
|
50.2%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
53.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 57x |
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 42x |
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 34x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples | 30x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 27x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $717 |