Emachines E527

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemEmachines E527  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines eMachines E527
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '19 at 01:49
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron 900
uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 24.2
2-Core 32.5
31% 40.3 Pts
4-Core 35.5
8-Core 34.4
5% 35 Pts
64-Core 31.8
2% 31.8 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 0459) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1.3
0% 1.17 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.3
0% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.18%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545016B9A300 160GB-$44
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PBBO
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 367
Mixed 4.2
133% 186 MB/s
4K Read 76.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
3,268% 25.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 34%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical E527 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Emachines E527

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $172Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback