Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A79XTD EVO  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '19 at 01:36
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 103
55% 83.5 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 302
33% 254 Pts
64-Core 298
20% 298 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$145
Gigabyte(1458 3FCC) ≥ 4GB; Gigabyte
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.9% Average
Lighting 176
Reflection 137
Parallax 165
46% 159 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 152
Splatting 112
41% 120 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 44%
AMD HD 5770
Asus(1043 0344) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.32% Terrible
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 41.5
12% 38.6 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 29.4
9% 28.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.32%
Great: 10%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$85
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 89 87 89 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.7% Average
Read 188
Write 177
Mixed 172
SusWrite 87.9
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 33.5
111% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31.8
DQ Write 65.7
DQ Mixed 41.1
33% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$59
501GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 90 87 89 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 108
Write 100
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 88.9
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 12.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 9.1
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32%
Great: 50%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 1,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $210
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $158Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback