Positivo E900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 30%
Workstation 21%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemPositivo E900  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo E900
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '19 at 22:16
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N2920
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 24.1
2-Core 48
30% 42.4 Pts
4-Core 95.9
8-Core 96
13% 95.9 Pts
64-Core 95.9
6% 95.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5470) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.73% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 2.7
0% 2 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 5.4
1% 3.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.73%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$43
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 80 75 88 88 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 100
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 84.6
57% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown GKH400SO51208-1333 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.7% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 8.7
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.6
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 47%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical E900 Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 50%
Workstation 20%

System: Positivo E900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $90
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $368Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback