Positivo E900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemPositivo E900  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo E900
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '19 at 22:16
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Celeron N2920
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
SC Int 32.9
SC Float 18.9
SC Mixed 24.1
20% 25.3 Pts
QC Int 128
QC Float 74.9
QC Mixed 95.9
23% 99.6 Pts
MC Int 129
MC Float 74.2
MC Mixed 95.9
15% 99.8 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 18%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5470) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 2.7
0% 2 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 5.4
2% 3.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$30
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 80 75 88 88 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 100
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 84.6
57% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown GKH400SO51208-1333 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.7% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 8.7
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.6
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical E900 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Positivo E900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $70
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $145Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $75SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback