Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '19 at 19:00
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Memory 91.4 1-Core 130 2-Core 241 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 729 77% 618 Pts	64-Core 739 46% 739 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3717) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 142 Parallax 121 111% 133 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 133 Splatting 106 95% 117 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTE110S 128GB 4,843 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1026E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 55 57 72 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 1,322 Write 33.1 Mixed 148 SusWrite 58.5 82% 390 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 12.8 70% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 397 DQ Write 50.4 DQ Mixed 114 111% 187 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 157%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 111GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 146 164 301 153 270 MB/s Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.3% Above average	Read 164 Write 88.6 Mixed 170 SusWrite 224 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 24.3 93% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 148 112% 148 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 11.1 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 11.6 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 65.1 61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	475x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	346x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	265x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	166x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	160x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	150x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	113x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	47x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	130x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $529

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16