PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 6.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Intel MAHOBAY (all builds) |
Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20180917 |
Uptime | 2 Days |
Run Date | May 23 '19 at 15:27 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
73.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 250
XFX(1682 7250) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 667 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1
|
6.96%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HTS542512K9SA00 120GB-$25
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB2OC31P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 25 28 32 32 25 MB/s
|
24.4%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$33
216GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 102 101 102 102 MB/s
|
56.2%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
49.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 108x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 75x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 73x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 97x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 78x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 56x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |