Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 47%
Desktop 72%
Workstation 54%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 23 '19 at 13:46
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
1-Core 121
2-Core 240
85% 181 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 656
71% 549 Pts
64-Core 749
50% 749 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$799
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (161 fps cap detected)
45.1% Average
Lighting 162
Reflection 160
Parallax 161
42% 161 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 161
Splatting 161
50% 161 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 141%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 10C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 26
Parallax 22.7
6% 23.3 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 33.2
7% 25.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 460A 480GB-$300
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 278 323 262 273 238 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 361
Write 332
Mixed 241
SusWrite 284
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 31.8
115% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 197
164% 241 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FBD 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.2% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 23.6
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 24.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 4,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 15%
Desktop 59%
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $137Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $203AMD RX 590 $186Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback