Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 23 '19 at 13:46
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 707
74% 594 Pts
64-Core 823
51% 823 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.39
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.7% Average
Lighting 53.9
Reflection 61.5
Parallax 50.3
44% 55.2 fps
MRender 77
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 70.2
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 133%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 10C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.92% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 10
Parallax 7.09
6% 8.06 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 6.53
Splatting 14.4
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.92%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 460A 480GB-$300
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 278 323 262 273 238 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 361
Write 332
Mixed 241
SusWrite 284
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 31.8
115% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 197
164% 241 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FBD 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.2% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 23.6
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 24.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback