HP 285 G2 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 285 G2 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B60
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180115
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateMay 23 '19 at 12:35
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A8 PRO-7600B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 126
51% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 225
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 223
15% 223 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 2B60) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.09% Terrible
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 16
Parallax 29.2
4% 19.5 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 11.1
5% 12.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.09%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$22
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 102 124 125 124 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 124
Write 106
Mixed 26
SusWrite 119
68% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 104%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$80
788GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 55 56 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 58.7
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 55.4
37% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 59%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
30GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 17 12 12 9.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 30
Write 26
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 11
31% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
46% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.6% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 34%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 285 G2 MT Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP 285 G2 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $56
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback