HP 285 G2 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.82% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHP 285 G2 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B60
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180115
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateMay 23 '19 at 12:35
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD A8 PRO-7600B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44% Average
SC Int 68.1
SC Float 62.9
SC Mixed 65.5
52% 65.5 Pts
QC Int 234
QC Float 182
QC Mixed 220
48% 212 Pts
MC Int 247
MC Float 185
MC Mixed 223
33% 218 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 2B60) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 16
Parallax 29.2
6% 19.5 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 11.1
6% 12.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 8%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$16
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 102 124 125 124 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 124
Write 106
Mixed 26
SusWrite 119
68% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 102%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$67
788GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 55 56 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 58.7
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 55.4
37% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 58%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
30GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 17 12 12 9.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 30
Write 26
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 11
31% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
46% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
21.6% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical 285 G2 MT Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP 285 G2 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $75SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback