Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '19 at 12:28
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 71.8 1-Core 113 2-Core 219 74% 135 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 717 72% 583 Pts	64-Core 922 57% 922 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.3.3 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Lighting 72.2 Reflection 72.1 Parallax 98.9 59% 81.1 fps	MRender 72.3 Gravity 72.1 Splatting 58.7 54% 67.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 199 159 169 159 176 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 483 Mixed 340 SusWrite 219 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 87.2 4K Mixed 52.1 175% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 308 231% 311 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 123%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 748GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 84 83 83 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 75 Write 51.8 Mixed 38.3 SusWrite 82.5 45% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 117 114 120 117 118 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 136 Write 122 Mixed 75 SusWrite 119 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 101%
Intenso Micro Line 32GB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 30GB free, PID 1000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 14 13 15 15 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	7.52% Terrible	Read 20 Write 4.2 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 14.7 16% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.52% Great: 9%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 592GB free, PID 61b6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 97 97 97 97 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 92.5 Write 68 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 95.7 104% 78.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 42%
ASMT 2105 128GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 110GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 225 228 229 223 227 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	148% Outstanding	Read 363 Write 302 Mixed 132 SusWrite 229 326% 256 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 10.2 862% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 14.4 DQ Write 12.5 DQ Mixed 9.6 805% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 190%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 2x8GB 3,225 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	MC Read 34 MC Write 32.5 MC Mixed 29.5 91% 32 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 25.1 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 97.2 41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)