Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 6910p (RM325UT#ABC) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30C1
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070913
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	May 23 '19 at 05:12
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7250-$97 3,604 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Memory 68.1 1-Core 23.2 2-Core 44.8 33% 45.4 Pts	4-Core 44.7 8-Core 44.7 6% 44.7 Pts	64-Core 44.3 3% 44.3 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS542580K9SA00 80GB-$55 612 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: BBBOC31P SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 21 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 23.6 Write 21.5 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 20.3 15% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 25%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB 7,454 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 18 20 16 20 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	8.64% Terrible	Read 25.3 Write 7.5 Mixed 6.3 SusWrite 18.7 17% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.64% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.6 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16