| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock N68C-S UCC (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110919 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 22 '19 at 15:37 |
| Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 62% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
38.3%
Below average
|
36% 50.1 Pts
|
8% 62.1 Pts
|
4% 57.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Gigabyte(1458 3495) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
|
2.81%
Terrible
|
2% 3.25 fps
|
4% 4.32 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intenso SSD 120GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q083
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 98 47 70 68 MB/s
|
27.9%
Poor
|
30% 135 MB/s
|
42% 14.8 MB/s
|
31% 54.6 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 134 138 145 161 160 MB/s
|
85%
Excellent
|
91% 125 MB/s
|
136% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
|
41.9%
Average
|
39% 54.3 MB/s
|
57% 0.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
15%
Very poor
|
13% 4.6 GB/s
|
12% 4.07 GB/s
|
36% 111 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 213 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples | 18x |
| Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 17x |
| Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples | 20x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 9x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |