Asrock Z77 Pro3

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '19 at 14:56
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Memory 88.3 1-Core 125 2-Core 235 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 629 69% 545 Pts	64-Core 628 39% 628 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22% Poor	Lighting 25.7 Reflection 24.6 Parallax 31.6 21% 27.3 fps	MRender 34 Gravity 30.7 Splatting 25.6 24% 30.1 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 399GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 161 164 163 163 164 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 480 Write 458 Mixed 438 SusWrite 159 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 58.9 4K Mixed 40.2 130% 43.4 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 364 274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 335GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 160 163 162 162 163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Read 481 Write 458 Mixed 441 SusWrite 158 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 40.9 133% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 367 276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 133%
WD Blue SN500 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$37 14,368 User benchmarks, average bench 189% 416GB free Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 261 268 267 267 268 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 650 Write 615 Mixed 624 SusWrite 260 121% 537 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 46 160% 59.4 MB/s	DQ Read 778 DQ Write 731 DQ Mixed 863 618% 790 MB/s
Poor: 133% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 228%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 268GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 319 333 336 336 336 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 394 Write 390 Mixed 378 SusWrite 323 84% 371 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 26.3 86% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 147 104% 130 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 129%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 552GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 80 81 81 81 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 88 Write 81.3 Mixed 76 SusWrite 79.9 60% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 67%
Hitachi HUS728T8TALE6L4 8TB 1,005 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 7.5TB free Firmware: V8GNW410 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 184 190 190 190 191 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 137%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 112GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 70 70 70 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 67.7 Write 68.8 Mixed 39.6 SusWrite 69.4 45% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 29GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 78 79 80 80 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 85.8 Write 82.1 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 76.6 50% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600EL Series 4x4GB 672 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	50.7% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 17.6 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Pro3 Builds (Compare 1,277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro3 - $212

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	458x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	199x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	174x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	118x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	88x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	52x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	52x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	37x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	45x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $492

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16