Asus X99-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO  (all builds)
Memory38.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160628
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '19 at 13:51
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 156
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 524
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 662
41% 662 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 191
Parallax 203
131% 185 fps
MRender 234
Gravity 180
Splatting 115
138% 176 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 127%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 241 309 295 288 288 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 407
Write 442
Mixed 315
SusWrite 282
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 33.1
120% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 178
152% 216 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 107%
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
176GB free
Firmware: 1122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 210 140 176 177 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 482
Write 447
Mixed 338
SusWrite 192
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 34.8
126% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 207
190% 290 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
3TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 129 129 131 132 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 131
Write 128
Mixed 106
SusWrite 131
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 96%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
5TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 199 204 195 207 206 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 109%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 167 170 169 171 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 104
Mixed 108
SusWrite 168
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
4.5TB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 170 176 177 179 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 111
Write 127
Mixed 38
SusWrite 173
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.9
294% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD G.SKILL F4-3600C19-16GVRB BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD G.SKILL F4-3600C19-16GVRB 48GB
2400, 2133, 2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 41.8
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback