Asus M4A77D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M4A77D  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 0.03125 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '19 at 13:42
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Phenom II X4 925-$150
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
35.4% Below average
1-Core 51.9
2-Core 103
36% 77.7 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 206
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 208
14% 208 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
Sapphire(174B E186) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 82.4
Reflection 56.1
Parallax 76.8
22% 71.8 fps
MRender 44.7
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 63.2
18% 57.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Ocz-agil ITY3 256GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 96 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 134
Write 195
Mixed 146
SusWrite 95.6
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 24
91% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 73.5
70% 108 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 54%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 96 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 167
Write 168
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 95.6
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 109%
Maxtor S TM3320613AS 320GB
66GB free
Firmware: MC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 95 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
48% Average
Read 71.6
Write 69.7
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 95.5
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48%
Great: 64%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$99
147GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 16 0.4 5.9 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 43.3
Write 43.1
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 24
26% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 58%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
10GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 5.4 5 5.5 5 5.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 6.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.5
9% 7.77 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
56% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 8%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M4A77D Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A77D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $231
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback