HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '19 at 12:35
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 44%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.2% Very poor
SC Int 29.9
SC Float 31
SC Mixed 31
24% 30.6 Pts
QC Int 88.2
QC Float 84.3
QC Mixed 85.6
20% 86 Pts
MC Int 139
MC Float 144
MC Mixed 157
22% 147 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5% Terrible
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 14
4% 12.3 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 15.7
6% 13.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5%
Great: 5%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$45
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 71 67 63 66 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 126
Write 121
Mixed 164
SusWrite 69.1
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 14.2
41% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 101
85% 123 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 73%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
74GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 22 23 15 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 2.7
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 18.6
20% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.7
143% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905428-051.A00LF Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 9905428-051.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.8% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 2,121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $353
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $355Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $273Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $85SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback