Lenovo 81D2

Performance Results

Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemLenovo 81D2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '19 at 09:22
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 36.9
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 110
40% 70.7 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 396
38% 308 Pts
64-Core 420
28% 420 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Legend(17AA 38EE) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: NDA
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
4.18% Terrible
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 22.8
4% 18.2 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 15.8
4% 13.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.18%
Great: 12%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$31
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 152 121 148 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 396
Write 302
Mixed 291
SusWrite 129
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 11.5
39% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 74.3
DQ Mixed 43.7
47% 78.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.7% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 12.7
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.1
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 81D2 Builds (Compare 3,117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 55%
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81D2

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback