Asrock Z97 Extreme9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140523
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '19 at 05:48
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
87% 185 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 645
68% 531 Pts
64-Core 638
43% 638 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$528
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 397
Reflection 387
Parallax 401
103% 395 fps
MRender 241
Gravity 398
Splatting 257
98% 299 fps
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 111%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$107
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 154 154 163 161 164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 359
Write 329
Mixed 288
SusWrite 158
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 47.4
162% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 202
152% 205 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 135%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
4GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,705
Write 882
Mixed 454
221% 1,014 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 47.8
200% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 1,086
DQ Write 766
DQ Mixed 862
661% 904 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 239%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$107
466GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 106 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 342
Write 330
Mixed 303
SusWrite 106
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 53.8
170% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 202
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 135%
Intel 730 Series 240GB-$350
43GB free
Firmware: L2010420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 165 167 167 153 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 314
Write 131
Mixed 152
SusWrite 156
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 30.2
128% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 132
115% 179 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 95%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$330
372GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 106 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 354
Write 325
Mixed 318
SusWrite 106
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 49.6
168% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 198
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$73
219GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 310 307 311 312 307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 349
Write 331
Mixed 317
SusWrite 312
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 52.7
174% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 197
149% 201 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 124%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$138
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 170 171 170 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 165
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 169
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 99%
Great: 99%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 145 146 149 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 159
Write 146
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 145
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 82%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$73
791GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 147 148 148 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 152
Write 148
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 147
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 108%
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 1TB
536GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 38 38 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.5% Above average
Read 35
Write 36.5
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 37.4
50% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 10.6
783% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 10.2
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 11.4
864% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 65%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z97 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $1,025
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $73
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback