Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics75.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190403
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 22 '19 at 04:38
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-9700K-$356
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
1-Core 141
2-Core 258
95% 199 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,022
99% 794 Pts
64-Core 1058
71% 1058 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$409
Asus(1043 859F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Lighting 289
Reflection 284
Parallax 326
76% 299 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 275
Splatting 220
74% 232 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 86%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$350
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 449 481 419 365 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,264
Write 733
Mixed 556
SusWrite 440
166% 748 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 45.6
165% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 687
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 471
349% 473 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 149%
Great: 282%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
962GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 91 97 91 97 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 95.1
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 82%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 123 132 127 131 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 148
Write 132
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 129
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 90%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$90
795GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 77 73 79 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 113
Write 110
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 75.5
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$93
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 135 145 136 148 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 141
Write 130
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 142
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 500GB
246GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 71 77 70 76 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
31% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 63
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 74.7
83% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GB-$165
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
75.7% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 24.8
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23.4
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 113%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $632
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $83
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $607SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback