Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	77% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '19 at 01:36
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 96.5 1-Core 158 2-Core 317 104% 191 Pts	4-Core 556 8-Core 891 89% 724 Pts	64-Core 1,094 68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4995) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77% Very good	Lighting 97.9 Reflection 105 Parallax 103 80% 102 fps	MRender 87.8 Gravity 92.1 Splatting 83.5 72% 87.8 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 402GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1994 2030 1975 1963 1962 1978 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	327% Outstanding	Read 2,118 Write 2173 Mixed 944 SusWrite 1,984 406% 1,804 MB/s	4K Read 52.1 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 65.1 227% 79.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,253 DQ Write 1,060 DQ Mixed 1135 856% 1,149 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 327% Great: 393%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 143 143 144 144 143 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 220 Mixed 104 SusWrite 144 120% 164 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.1 392% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 624GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 135 127 127 128 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Read 149 Write 185 Mixed 100 SusWrite 128 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.1 338% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 195 196 195 197 198 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 165 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 195 117% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 701GB free Firmware: MJAOA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 109 109 108 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 122 Write 122 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 108 70% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 91%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 740GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 83 83 83 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 79.7 Write 84.2 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 82.4 56% 75.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 97%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27 3,642 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 30GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 24 26 24 26 26 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	75% Very good	Read 214 Write 36.5 Mixed 84 SusWrite 26.1 94% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 11.5 830% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 16.5 DQ Write 18.8 DQ Mixed 12.7 1,133% 16 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114 144,399 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 38.5 MC Write 39.9 MC Mixed 31.1 104% 36.5 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 43.6 SC Mixed 30.5 92% 32.3 GB/s	Latency 52.2 77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $440

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,854x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,606x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	554x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,302x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	649x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $630Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	639x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	856x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	565x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	288x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	254x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,388

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16