Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '19 at 00:15
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 272
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 837
85% 687 Pts
64-Core 1,025
63% 1,025 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 17.5
15% 19.2 fps
MRender 27.4
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 24.3
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 641 327 327 326 324 303 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 2,088
Write 1,508
Mixed 636
SusWrite 375
254% 1,152 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 49.9
218% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 932
DQ Write 909
DQ Mixed 757
614% 866 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 213%
Great: 236%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
8GB free
Firmware: 400i
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 281
Write 239
Mixed 263
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 37.9
146% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 228
180% 252 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 95%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50
521GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 109 103 105 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 72
Write 85.7
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 106
52% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.4
275% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 108%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
56GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 3.9 2.9 5.1 5.5 5.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10.2
Write 8
SusWrite 4.8
9% 7.67 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.4
78% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22.8
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 22.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X CODE Builds (Compare 1,237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $827
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback