Asus M2N-MX SE Plus

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M2N-MX SE Plus  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 22:43
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Processor model unknown
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 43.9
2-Core 87
43% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 171
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 50
3% 50 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36B9) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 43.2
Reflection 42.5
Parallax 38.3
35% 41.3 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 34.3
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721032CLA 320GB
152GB free
Firmware: JPFO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 73 76 74 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 68
Write 76
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 72.2
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 48%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 41 51 55 56 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 55
Write 54.3
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 51.6
38% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 35%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
2GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.5 3.9 3.4 3.6 3.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
5.32% Terrible
Read 23.5
Write 3.3
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 3.8
10% 9.35 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.32%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-MX SE Plus Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N-MX SE Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $109
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback