Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 19:59
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 224
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 760
77% 623 Pts
64-Core 967
60% 967 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 195
Parallax 189
142% 186 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 177
Splatting 125
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
746GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1315 1310 1323 1299 1167 1173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,387
Write 1,221
Mixed 1,186
SusWrite 1,264
285% 1,264 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 78.8
250% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 722
DQ Write 555
DQ Mixed 632
475% 636 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 240%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
297GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 478 479 478 471 472 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 453
Mixed 380
SusWrite 476
101% 446 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 44.1
150% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
193GB free
Firmware: AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 250 250 252 252 253 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 423
Write 254
Mixed 171
SusWrite 251
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 22.4
104% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 57.9
105% 211 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$234
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 37.2
108% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 20.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback