PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock P43DE3 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100920 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | May 21 '19 at 18:27 |
Run Duration | 188 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5460-$190
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
46.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.3.1
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 109 42 6.8 52 41 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
38GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 121 120 133 133 131 MB/s
|
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
81GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 97 103 104 99 89 MB/s
|
57.6%
Above average
|
|||
Flash USB Disk 16GB
7GB free, PID 3a04
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 5.5 6.4 8 8 MB/s
|
5.36%
Terrible
|
|||
HGST HTS 545050A7E680 500GB
389GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.4 5.3 MB/s
|
6.77%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples | 3x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 2x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 3x |
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples | 2x |
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 35% - Below average | Total price: $256 |