PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA (all builds) |
Memory | 6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20141205 |
Uptime | 15.9 Days |
Run Date | May 21 '19 at 13:05 |
Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
Run User | NOR-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.9%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 3660) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 29 27 27 25 28 MB/s
|
53.7%
Above average
|
|||
WD Elements 1TB
2GB free, PID 1048
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 26 27 26 MB/s
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C8 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
84%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 237x |
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 114x |
Core i7-4930KIntel $93Bench 77%, 22,204 samples | 52x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 56x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 40x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 35x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $1,155 |