PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS M470-2 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D2778-C1 |
Memory | 15.3 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111219 |
Uptime | 2 Days |
Run Date | May 21 '19 at 12:36 |
Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3565
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
71.2%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 62 67 74 76 82 MB/s
|
56.5%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 18GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
|
41.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 29x |
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples | 22x |
Xeon W3530Intel $290Bench 65%, 5,773 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 13x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 10x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 25% - Poor | Total price: $397 |