| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A55M-HD+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150522 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 21 '19 at 10:27 |
| Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
| Run User | BIH-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
40%
Average
|
42% 68.1 Pts
|
12% 89.8 Pts
|
6% 103 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 852D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
|
1.3%
Terrible
|
1% 1.44 fps
|
2% 2.03 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 68 75 79 77 80 MB/s
|
57.9%
Above average
|
74% 101 MB/s
|
201% 1.5 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
427GB free
Firmware: GG2OAH20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 87 95 89 95 95 MB/s
|
50.5%
Above average
|
51% 70.4 MB/s
|
102% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
21%
Poor
|
19% 6.77 GB/s
|
19% 6.5 GB/s
|
36% 113 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A55M-HD+ Builds (Compare 43 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-HD+
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 6x |
| A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples | 5x |
| A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples | 4x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 4x |
| Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $116 |