Greatwall W1410A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.17%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemGreatwall W1410A  (all builds)
MotherboardGreatWall AN10D
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 09:10
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.17% Terrible
1-Core 27.3
2-Core 37.9
16% 32.6 Pts
4-Core 44
8-Core 52.5
6% 48.2 Pts
64-Core 50.4
3% 50.4 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.17%
Great: 17%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.2
0% 1.3 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.1
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SDSA6AM-008G-1006 8GB
6GB free
Firmware: U218000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 17 18 14 15 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.7% Terrible
Read 2
Write 24.1
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 16.4
8% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.3
137% 1.63 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.87 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 312
13% 312 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 31%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical W1410A Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Greatwall W1410A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $233Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback