HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121002
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 08:22
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 172
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 406
44% 349 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 350
Mixed 59
64% 293 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 26.5
68% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 36.1
99% 209 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 103%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59
202GB free
Firmware: JF3OA0E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 66 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 64
Write 60.5
Mixed 40
SusWrite 65.2
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 29 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 24.8
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 28.4
20% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
230% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 87%
Philips USB Flash Drive 64GB
47GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 21 20 22 22 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 199
Write 48
Mixed 12
SusWrite 21.7
66% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
57% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 39%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
216GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 41.2
Write 38
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 39.1
49% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-095.D00LF Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 9905428-095.D00LF Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.8% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback