HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121002
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 08:22
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$390
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 168
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 414
44% 344 Pts
64-Core 412
28% 412 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4% Terrible
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 12.3
3% 11.5 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 15.8
4% 13.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$99
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 470
Write 350
Mixed 59
64% 293 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 26.5
68% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 36.1
99% 209 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 102%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$42
202GB free
Firmware: JF3OA0E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 66 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 64
Write 60.5
Mixed 40
SusWrite 65.2
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 29 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 24.8
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 28.4
20% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
230% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 87%
Philips USB Flash Drive 64GB
47GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 21 20 22 22 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 199
Write 48
Mixed 12
SusWrite 21.7
66% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
57% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 39%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
216GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 41.2
Write 38
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 39.1
49% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905428-095.D00LF Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 9905428-095.D00LF Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.8% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 3,284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $353
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $158Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback